« Articles of Interest | Main | Articles of Interest 3-17-2008 »

March 16, 2008

Articles of Interest 3-16-2008

234 Days until Election Day

MORNING UPDATE:

We just completed a 3-day “best practices” retreat of state chairs from around the country.  We had some great presentations from various chairmen as well as special guests who shared their perspectives including Newt Gingrich, Governor Romney, Nevada Governor Gibbons, Florida Governor Crist, Grover Norquist, and others.

There was an optimistic and excited mood that sent us all home ready to bring about “real change” by electing John McCain our next president.  The political environment, political realities, and world affairs creates a “perfect storm” for a McCain candidacy.  We can make a difference; we can make it happen!

Monday is the deadline for many businesses to file their annual tax returns...a good time to remember the Dems provided us with a replacement to the long-impugned SBT that is turning out to be even worse than the SBT – and then they added a 29-percent surcharge to an already horrid and too high tax. What kind of geniuses think higher taxes will bring jobs and revitalize our economy?

Michigan House Republicans have a plan to help families stay in their homes by easing the burden when home values go down and taxable values go up, but House Democrats won’t even give the bills a hearing.  More below…

THE REST OF THE STORY:

-House GOP plan would help struggling home owners, yet Democrat Speaker Andy Dillon and his cronies won’t even give it a hearing.

The House Republican reform plan prohibits property tax increases if a home's value increases by less than the rate of inflation. The GOP proposal also makes it easier to appeal a property assessment by expanding Board of Review hours and the timeframe between when an assessment is received and when you can appeal.

The statewide deadline to appeal your property taxes at the local board of review begins March 10 in most communities. In addition, many property owners are frustrated by property assessments that do not reflect the current market and the bureaucratic hurdles that come with trying to appeal an assessment. People are also having a hard time selling homes or affording the taxes on a new home.

The GOP proposal won’t affect local government services because the plan limits future tax increases to a reasonable level as opposed to reducing current revenue.

Read more about the House GOP plan here:

http://www.gophouse.com/readarticle.asp?id=4787&District=86

Saul Anuzis

STATE STORIES

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VE2JSO0&show_article=1&catnum=3

Clinton

Backs

Michigan

Revote Plan 

Mar 15 03:53 PM

US

/Eastern

By BETH FOUHY

Associated Press Writer

SCRANTON

,

Penn.

(AP) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton Saturday said she supported an effort by Michigan Democrats to hold a new primary in June.

"It needs to get resolved and hopefully

Michigan

by the end of this week will have done that,"

Clinton

told reporters on her campaign plane between stops in

Pennsylvania

. "I think they are moving in an appropriate direction to have a revote." Under a plan being finalized by several Democratic members of Congress and other party leaders in

Michigan

, the state would hold a new primary in early June—most likely on June 3—that would allow its delegates to be seated at the party's national convention this summer in

Denver

. The state Legislature is expected to take up the matter next week. The Democratic National Committee punished

Michigan

and

Florida

for moving up their primaries before Feb. 5, stripping them of all their delegates. The two states have been struggling to come up with alternative plans, but

Michigan

appears closer to resolving the matter.

Clinton

won the

Michigan

primary on Jan. 15 and has said she would like those results to stand. But Obama removed his name from the ballot after the DNC stripped the state of delegates for moving up its primary and did not campaign there.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLINTON_MIOL-?SITE=MIPON&SECTION=STATE&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-03-15-16-02-36

Clinton

expresses support for

Michigan

primary revote proposal

By BETH FOUHY

Associated Press Writer

Mar 15, 4:02 PM EDT

SCRANTON

,

Penn.

(AP) -- Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton Saturday said she supported an effort by Michigan Democrats to hold a new primary in June.

"It needs to get resolved and hopefully

Michigan

by the end of this week will have done that,"

Clinton

told reporters on her campaign plane between stops in

Pennsylvania

. "I think they are moving in an appropriate direction to have a revote."Under a plan being finalized by several Democratic members of Congress and other party leaders in

Michigan

, the state would hold a new primary in early June - most likely on June 3 - that would allow its delegates to be seated at the party's national convention this summer in

Denver

. The state Legislature is expected to take up the matter next week.The Democratic National Committee punished

Michigan

and

Florida

for moving up their primaries before Feb. 5, stripping them of all their delegates. The two states have been struggling to come up with alternative plans, but

Michigan

appears closer to resolving the matter.

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080315/POLITICS01/803150406

Draft legislation for

Michigan

redo primary expected by Sunday

Deb Price and Mark Hornbeck / The

Detroit

News

Saturday, March 15, 2008

WASHINGTON

-- Draft language of legislation may be ready as early as Saturday night to set up a Democratic presidential primary redo in

Michigan

, according to a knowledgeable source. The draft will likely be circulated to key legislators and other players on Sunday, the source said. It could then go up for vote in the

Michigan

legislature this coming week, the source said.  State Sen. Tupac Hunter, the co-chair of the Barack Obama campaign in

Michigan

, said Saturday before any legislation moves, it should be "signed off" by the Obama and Hillary Clinton campaigns, the Democratic National Committee and the Michigan Democratic Party.  "Everybody has to sign off on it or else we haven't met the goal of reaching something that is fair," said Hunter, who hasn't seen draft wording of legislation needed to set a state-run primary into motion.

Hunter says he still prefers splitting the delegates of

Michigan

50-50 between Obama and Hillary Clinton.  "Speaking for myself, I am not ready to let go of the idea of splitting the delegates 50-50, so we can move forward and spend our resources on defeating (presumptive Republican presidential nominee) John McCain in the fall. A redo would only mean a few delegates either way," added Hunter.

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080315/POLITICS01/803150353/1022

Lawmakers asked to OK primary redo

Michigan

powerbrokers push ahead with idea for Democratic primary in June, but obstacles remain.

Deb Price and Mark Hornbeck / The

Detroit

News

Saturday, March 15, 2008

WASHINGTON

-- A high-powered panel of Democrats seeking to get the state's delegates seated at the national convention in August said Friday it's turning to the state Legislature to approve a do-over primary in early June. But time is short, and there are many obstacles. And while Sen. Hillary Clinton's camp was upbeat about a

Michigan

spring primary, Sen. Barack Obama's spokesmen were less than enthusiastic.

"At this time, we are focusing on the possibility of a state-run primary in early June, which would not use any state funding. This option would require the passage of legislation by the state Legislature, and we look forward to working with the members of the Legislature in the coming days to see if this option can be made a reality," U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, U.S. Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, UAW President Ron Gettelfinger and Democratic National Committee member Debbie Dingell said in a joint statement.

The DNC refuses to recognize

Michigan

's 156 national convention delegates because the state broke scheduling rules in holding a Jan. 15 primary. A June do-over approved by the DNC would allow

Michigan

delegates to vote in the tight contest between Clinton and Obama.

http://www.monroenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080315/NEWS01/805845056

Reform package to address mortgage ill, Richardville says

by Charles Slat

March 15. 2008 12:44AM

Legislation that would regulate mortgage brokers in

Michigan

might be part of the solution to the sub-prime mortgage crisis that has led to foreclosed homes, left families in financial ruin and driven down property values in general, says state Sen. Randy Richardville, R-Monroe.  "There are about 30,000 mortgage brokers in

Michigan

and they're not licensed today. Out of that 30,000, it's estimated that between 3,000 and 4,000 are writing bad mortgages and taking advantage of people," he said. "I've had people come and testify that they knew drug dealers who quit selling drugs to sell mortgages because they could make more money doing it."  Part of a 13-bill bipartisan package expected to be signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm within a week or two, the new laws also would require mortgage companies to require criminal record checks of their loan officers, mandate minimum education standards and continuing education requirements.

Rep. Richardville said the legislation is one of the major accomplishments in his first year presiding as chairman of the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee. He discussed the bills during a legislative update to the Monroe County Chamber of Commerce at Ambassador Hall on Friday.  He noted that the foreclosure problems affect everyone because when a house goes into foreclosure, it affects the property values of homes nearby. "Whether you have a financial problem or not, this affects you," he said.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MI_DETROIT_MAYOR_PERJURY_MIOL-?SITE=MIPON&SECTION=STATE&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-03-15-08-24-14

Wayne Co. prosecutor says she knows her decision on

Detroit

mayor

Mar 15, 8:24 AM EDT

DETROIT

(AP) -- Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy says she has made her decision about whether Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick will face perjury charges in a text message scandal.  Worthy tells WDIV-TV in

Detroit

that her team is wrapping up its review and drawing up papers but wouldn't reveal details. Her comments came Friday in a taped segment for "FlashPoint," scheduled to air Sunday morning.  Worthy on Wednesday said her office needed more time to investigate whether Kilpatrick and former top aide Christine Beatty lied under oath during a whistle-blowers' trial last summer. Both denied having a romantic relationship.  Kilpatrick approved a confidential settlement of that lawsuit that cost city taxpayers $8.4 million.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080316/NEWS01/803160577/1003

Mayor, backers pray as decision on charges looms

BY BEN SCHMITT

FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

March 16, 2008

Preparing for what could be a tense week politically, Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick met with 25 of his supporters Saturday to shore up support and prayers as the

Wayne

County

prosecutor's criminal investigation in the text message scandal winds down.

The meeting at City Hall comes a day after Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said she has made her decision in whether to charge Kilpatrick in the text message scandal.

About 25 pastors and union and business leaders gathered with the mayor for what they described as a prayer session.  Malik Shabazz, leader of the New Black Panthers in

Detroit

, said the meeting was not related to news that Worthy had made up her mind.

"We went to pray," Shabazz said. "Our mayor is a praying mayor. He believes in the power of prayer, and so do we.  "We were not there asking the mayor to resign, emphatically no. Nor should he resign."  The Rev. Horace Sheffield, pastor of

New

Galilee

Baptist

Church

in

Detroit

, also was in attendance.  He said the mayor was in need of support, and his backers went to encourage him to stay strong.

"No matter how tough you are, these kinds of times can be very trying,"

Sheffield

said. "To know that we embraced him and continued to pray for him was heartening for him."

Worthy made her comments Friday in an interview taped for WDIV's "FlashPoint" to air at 10 a.m. today on Local 4.

Shabazz said the prayer session began at 10 a.m. and lasted about two hours. Others in attendance included Kilpatrick's chief of staff, Kandia Milton, and local union leaders Willie Hampton and Jimmy Settles.

Late last month, Kilpatrick called a private meeting with about 30 union leaders to plead for their support as the City Council prepared to vote on a resolution asking the mayor to resign. Some union members called council members, urging them to delay the vote. The vote was postponed until Tuesday.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MI_SUNSHINE_WEEK_MICHIGAN_MIOL-?SITE=MIPON&SECTION=STATE&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-03-15-18-56-11

E-mails requested from attorney general, secretary of state

By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN

Associated Press Writer

Mar 15, 6:56 PM EDT

LANSING

,

Mich.

(AP) -- Every day, state workers get thousands of e-mails from citizens, co-workers, bosses and junk mailers.  Most of that e-mail they receive - and send - probably will be deleted once the workers no longer need it. But because some of those e-mails contain information about how government policies are set, legal matters, and budget and meeting records, they have to be kept for varying periods of time - sometimes forever.  The Department of History, Arts and Libraries is responsible for archiving important material and for helping agencies develop their policies for what e-mails can be deleted and how long others should be kept.  "There's no average time," says government records archivist Caryn Wojcik, who helps oversee around 900 different records retention policies for the state's executive branch. "There are a lot of unique records in state government, so there's a lot of unique retention requirements."  Any e-mails sent or received by the governor, lieutenant governor, lawmakers or judges aren't covered by the Michigan Freedom of Information Act.  Among state agencies, if an e-mail is requested under the Michigan Freedom of Information Act or is pertinent to litigation, it must be kept. But everything else is governed by the record retention policies. E-mail and attachments that must be kept permanently for historical or legal purposes generally is printed out, stored and eventually moved to the Archives.  To get a glimpse at how top state officials handle their e-mail, The Associated Press submitted FOIA requests for

Secretary

of State Terri Lynn Land's e-mail from Feb. 5 and Attorney General Mike Cox's e-mail from Feb. 6. The results produced mostly routine correspondence between the two Republican officeholders and their staffs.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/03/heights_struggles_to_fix_perva.html

Muskegon

Heights

struggles to fix roads

by Federico Martinez | The

Muskegon

Chronicle

Sunday March 16, 2008, 8:44 AM

Signs of spring are in the air: Birds are singing. The sun is shining.  And cars are going bumpity-bump.  Nowhere has that been more prevalent than

Muskegon

Heights

where angry residents have been bombarding

Muskegon

Heights

City Hall

with pleas to "fix those potholes."  Their concerns are justified. Crater-like potholes up to 6 inches deep have ravaged long stretches of well-traveled streets such as Peck and

Sanford

, and

Summit

and Broadway avenues.  Just as unforgiving are the smaller, but seemingly never-ending gaps that litter side streets like Hovey and Hume.  Driving just a couple of blocks on many city streets can be downright discombobulating.  "I know — I'm driving around the potholes myself," said Gauntrial Morris, director of the city's Department of Public Works, in exasperation. Morris also lives in the city.  Two city road crews have been spending their days fixing holes since the snow and ice began melting, said Morris. The task has become so daunting that a

Muskegon

County

crew pitches in on many afternoons.  "It's like trying to bail out the Titanic with a Dixie Cup," said Morris, who was promoted to the director's position last year.  Old decisions, new problems Although potholes in

Michigan

are a rite of spring, the road problems in

Muskegon

Heights

have been exacerbated by city officials' past decisions.  The financially struggling city already was cutting back on road maintenance when Morris was hired as a DPW worker 12 years ago.  One of those cost-saving measures was to stop sealing cracks that appeared in the road. Instead, they waited until the holes appeared and then filled them.

NATIONAL STORIES

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1546275420080316?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true

eBay's Meg Whitman to co-chair McCain's campaign

Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:02pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Meg Whitman, eBay Inc.'s outgoing chief executive officer, will co-chair the national presidential campaign of U.S. Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee.  The organization said on Friday Whitman, 51, would play a lead role in the campaign's financing and policy development.  Since Whitman joined eBay in 1998, the 30-employee start-up has been transformed into a Fortune 500 company with nearly $8 billion in revenue.  This success made Whitman one of the most powerful women in business and earned her a ranking among Time Magazine's list of the world's most influential people.  Whitman announced in January that she would step down from the helm of eBay on March 31 and spend more time on philanthropy and politics.  She previously worked as a fund-raiser for McCain's rival, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who bowed out of the presidential race on February 7.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080315192610.stkxtxzt&show_article=1&catnum=3

McCain heads to Iraq,

Middle East

to burnish image: report 

Mar 15 03:26 PM

US

/Eastern

US Republican presidential candidate John McCain travels to Europe and the Middle East in the week ahead -- including a reported stop this weekend in Iraq -- to burnish his senior statesman credentials while Democratic rivals brawl back home.

The

Arizona

senator, who touts his foreign affairs experience over Democratic candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, leads a congressional delegation beginning Tuesday to meet the leaders of

Jordan

,

Israel

,

Britain

and

France

, according to his campaign office. But off the official schedule is a weekend trip to

Iraq

, according to Saturday's Washington Post, where he will see firsthand the effects of the troop "surge" for which he has been such a fervent advocate even as

US

public support for the war in

Iraq

slumped.

The delegation was to meet with US military officials and

Iraq

's leaders to assess the success of the surge strategy that deployed more soldiers to

Iraq

, the Post reported.

When contacted by AFP, McCain campaign aides were not able to confirm the

Iraq

leg of the trip. The trip abroad will give several heads of state a closer look at one of the three candidates battling for the White House. "The people he's going to meet with are going to try and find out from him what he would do as president," Jim Steinberg, a dean of public affairs at the

University

of

Texas

, told the daily. McCain's campaign will likely use the meetings with Jordan's King Abdullah,

Israel

's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to convey that the senator is at home on the world stage. The Vietnam war veteran and former prisoner of war recently likened himself to Britain's wartime prime minister Winston Churchill in a new ad laying out a hawkish foreign policy of "no surrender" to US foes including Islamic extremists.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25492

McCain Benefits from the Off-Balance Media

by Jennifer Rubin

Posted: 03/14/2008

For every major story, the mainstream media establishes a “narrative” -- the acceptable characterization of events to which they all adhere, adding their own dashes of bias and creativity. But in this election year, they haven’t yet established a narrative because whenever they establish the pro-Democrat theme du jour, events keep proving them wrong.  The first narrative was that the Democrats would quickly wrap up their race and leave the Republicans to fight among themselves for months. This, we were told, would be horrible for the Republicans prospects, revealing all their internal divisions and making it impossible for them to later mount a unified front against the Democrats. When that proved incorrect and the Democratic race lumbered on, the media pundits then declared that this was a good thing for the Democrats. The race was generating enthusiasm and huge voter turnout and the candidates were so well-behaved that the party would quickly come together to battle John McCain in the general election. Well, that seems increasingly unlikely with each passing day. (Even Nancy Pelosi can see that a “dream ticket” with both candidates is impossible since Hillary Clinton declared her opponent unqualified to be commander-in-chief.)  What we have seen (contrary to what the constantly off-balance MSM would have liked to have occurred) is that the Democrat candidates have begun to inflict potentially serious and long-lasting damage on each other. More importantly, they have done the work in undermining each other that McCain could never have possibly done himself. And their handiwork is not limited to a single issue.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120553936399438277.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

The Conservative Case for McCain

By MARK SANFORD

March 15, 2008

Last week, I asked David Walker, the

U.S.

comptroller general, why he is quitting his job to travel the country on a "fiscal wake-up tour." His answer: Because we have only five to 10 years to address the federal government's looming shortfalls before we're faced with a fiscal crisis.  In about a decade, the twin forces of demographics and compound interest will leave few options for solving the fiscal mess

Washington

has created. By then, our options will all be ugly. We could make draconian spending cuts, or impose large tax increases that will undermine our economy in the competitive global marketplace. Or we could debase the value of the dollar by printing a large amount of money. This would shrink the overall value of the federal government's debt. It would also wipe out the value of most Americans' savings.  Mr. Walker is right. And I join many others in saying that federal spending is now as significant an issue as the war on terror, federal judgeships and energy independence. The

U.S.

stands at a fiscal crossroads -- and the consequences of inaction, or wrongful action, will be real and severe.  Fortunately, the presidential election offers us a real choice in how to address the fiscal mess. To use a football analogy, we're at halftime; and the question for conservatives is whether to get off the bench for the second half of the game.  I sat out the first half, not endorsing a candidate, occupied with my day job and four young boys at home. But I'm now stepping onto the field and going to work to help John McCain. It's important that conservatives do the same.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25504

Your Second Amendment Rights Take the Stand

by Ericka Andersen

Posted: 03/14/2008

Individual American gun owners’ constitutional rights lie in the hands of the Supreme Court this Tuesday when they hear the case of

District of Columbia

v. Heller. The groundbreaking gun rights case will decide the fundamental question of whether the Second Amendment preserves an individual’s right to keep and bear arms or only protects the rights of those who belong to organized -- and government-sanctioned -- “militias” specifically mentioned in the Amendment. The Second Amendment says “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a

free state

, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”  The case arises from a successful challenge to the

District of Columbia

’s law that effectively bans private ownership of handguns and severely regulates the ability to have other guns -- shotguns and rifles -- in private possession. Originally upheld in federal district court, the DC gun ban was ruled unconstitutional in a very strong opinion issued by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit last year.  “This is one of the only cases in our lifetime when the Supreme Court will interpret meaning,” said legal expert Randy Barnett, a professor of legal theory at

Georgetown

University

Law

Center

, on a conference call yesterday afternoon. Barnett recently signed an amicus brief filed on behalf of Academics for the Second Amendment that intends a focus on the original meaning of the amendment. 

Washington

DC

currently enforces the nation’s strictest gun ban. A decision in this case would likely overturn these laws, setting a historical precedent that could affect the validity of dozens of gun laws across the nation.  Barnett calls it an “easy case” because the current gun ban is a complete ban to specifically “prevent law abiding citizens from using and keeping weapons for their own lawful use…[and] will be handled by the due process clause under the14th amendment.” As a report from the Heritage Foundation points out, “The brief also urges the Supreme Court to limit the same individual right it asks the court to recognize.” This has been referred to as “splitting the baby" and Barnett said it holds “no intellectual support.”  With no precedent to reference, the outcome will join the ranks of other hotly debated cases -- like Roe v. Wade -- that have divided the country. The case surfaced when a group of DC residents challenged the current law, eventually gaining acknowledgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit to continue until the Supreme Court took it on.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/03/15/ST2008031502430.html?hpid=topnews

D.C.'s Gun Ban Gets Day in Court

Justices' Decision May Set Precedent In Interpreting the 2nd Amendment

By Robert Barnes

Washington

Post Staff Writer

Sunday, March 16, 2008; Page A01

Despite mountains of scholarly research, enough books to fill a library shelf and decades of political battles about gun control, the Supreme Court will have an opportunity this week that is almost unique for a modern court when it examines whether the District's handgun ban violates the Second Amendment. The nine justices, none of whom has ever ruled directly on the amendment's meaning, will consider a part of the Bill of Rights that has existed without a definitive interpretation for more than 200 years. "This may be one of the only cases in our lifetime when the Supreme Court is going to be interpreting the meaning of an important provision of the Constitution unencumbered by precedent,'' said Randy E. Barnett, a constitutional scholar at the Georgetown University Law Center. "And that's why there's so much discussion on the original meaning of the Second Amendment.'' The outcome could roil the 2008 political campaigns, send a national message about what kinds of gun control are constitutional and finally settle the question of whether the 27-word amendment, with its odd structure and antiquated punctuation, provides an individual right to gun ownership or simply pertains to militia service.

"The case has been structured so that they have to confront the threshold question," said Robert A. Levy, the wealthy libertarian lawyer who has spent five years and his own money to bring

District of Columbia

v. Heller to the Supreme Court. "I think they have to come to grips with that." The stakes are obviously high for the District, which passed the nation's strictest gun-control law in 1976, just after residents were granted the authority to govern themselves. It virtually bans the private possession of handguns, and requires that rifles and shotguns in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or outfitted with a trigger lock.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/us/politics/16delegates.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1205673061-wedywV5CGR0rPzb+sVxXjg

For Democrats, Increased Fears of a Long Fight

By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JEFF ZELENY

Published: March 16, 2008

WASHINGTON

— Lacking a clear route to the selection of a Democratic presidential nominee, the party’s uncommitted superdelegates say they are growing increasingly concerned about the risks of a prolonged fight between Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, and perplexed about how to resolve the conflict.  Senator Sherrod Brown, right, who is an uncommitted superdelegate, with Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama at a news conference in February 2007. Interviews with dozens of undecided superdelegates — the elected officials and party leaders who could hold the balance of power for the nomination — found them uncertain about who, if anyone, would step in to fill a leadership vacuum and help guide the contest to a conclusion that would not weaken the Democratic ticket in the general election.

While many superdelegates said they intended to keep their options open as the race continued to play out over the next three months, the interviews suggested that the playing field was tilting slightly toward Mr. Obama in one potentially vital respect. Many of them said that in deciding whom to support, they would adopt what Mr. Obama’s campaign has advocated as the essential principle: reflecting the will of the voters.

Mr. Obama has won more states, a greater share of the popular vote and more pledged delegates than Mrs. Clinton.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080315184820.ctmb6rsn&show_article=1&catnum=3

Racism, sexism charges poison White House race 

Mar 15 02:48 PM

US

/Eastern

With Hillary Clinton running to be the first woman in the Oval Office and Barack Obama bidding to be the first black president, charges of racism or sexism were inevitably never far from the surface. But some are becoming concerned that the level of debate in the battle between the two Democratic candidates is sinking to new lows and detracting from the party's main aim of ousting the Republicans from the White House. Last week, Obama's campaign was up in arms accusing

Clinton

's aide Geraldine Ferraro of trying to write off the

Illinois

senator's success as due merely to his race. "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," said Ferraro, a trailblazing politician who was the party's and the country's first female vice presidential nominee in 1984, in an interview with a

California

newspaper. "And if he was a woman -- of any color -- he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is," Ferraro added.

She resigned from

Clinton

's campaign finance committee a day later, accusing the Obama campaign of playing the politically-charged racism card, in a country still plagued by racial divisions. "The Obama campaign is attacking me to hurt you. I won't let that happen," she wrote to the former first lady.

Clinton

publicly rejected Ferraro's comments about Obama, but her campaign, in turn, recalled certain comments by her rival's supporters which could be construed as sexist. In February, Air Force General Merrill McPeak came out in support of Obama, saying one of the reasons the Illinois senator had won his backing was because he didn't "go on television and have crying fits."

It was a deliberate swipe at Clinton, who in January had appeared to choke back tears at a

New Hampshire

campaign rally. Others have taken sides with Ferraro, pointing out that Obama has won several nominating contests in the country's deep South thanks to the African-American vote. In

Mississippi

for example he cruised to victory, taking 91 percent of the black vote, but winning over only 30 percent of white voters.

On the other hand, some have noted that Obama's mixed race origins -- his father was from

Kenya

and his white mother from

Kansas

-- are an essential part of his allure for voters who want a break with the politics of the past.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25496

Obama Spend-O-Rama

by Ross Kaminsky

Posted: 03/14/2008

Late Wednesday afternoon, Sen.Wayne Allard (R-Co.) introduced Amendment 4246 into the Senate budget debate. The amendment, which Allard calls “The Obama Spend-o-Rama” proposes funding 111 of the 188 spending proposals put out so far during Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) presidential campaign. (These were the proposals which Allard’s staff had time to analyze before the GOP leadership asked him to offer the amendment on the floor.) According to Allard, “There are another 77 proposals with unknown cost estimates that will add billions to this number.” (Click here to read Senator Allard’s Fiscal Responsibility Floor Statement.)  Allard freely admits that he will oppose his own amendment and urges other Senators to do the same. But, as a senior Senate staffer pointed out to HUMAN EVENTS, “Let’s see how many Senators who have endorsed Obama will actually vote for his budget.”  Some of the numbers around the federal budget are incomprehensibly large. How do you wrap your mind around a 5-year cost of $1.4 trillion?  Senator Allard offers some comparisons to help with that mental exercise:

• This new spending, if enacted, would represent an almost 10% increase over the President’s FY 2009 budget.

• This $300 billion spending proposal would cost more than 42 states’ budgets combined (general fund expenditures).

• It is more than the

United States

spent last year on imported oil ($294 billion net).

• It is more than 60% larger than any one-year federal spending increase, ever.

An initial draft of the Amendment which was obtained by HUMAN EVENTS shows its purpose of “raisi(ng) taxes by an unprecedented $1.4 trillion for the purpose of fully funding 111 new or expanded federal spending programs” and, referencing S. Con. Res. 70, the Fiscal Year 2009 budget proposal, lists 111 items in the format of “On page 11, line 4, increase the amount by $5,120,000,000.” 

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25509

Quid Pro QuObama?

by Erick Erickson

Posted: 03/14/2008

On the day Hillary Clinton’s campaign unloaded a press dossier on Barrack Obama’s mentor, the rabidly anti-American “preacher” Jeremiah Wright, who years ago presided at the marriage of  Barrack and Michelle Obama, the Obama campaign sought to divert attention by releasing Obama’s list of earmarks requests.  Perhaps he should have released something else.  Let’s follow the money to see if we can find the change Obama has been talking about.  In 2006, Barack Obama requested an earmark of $1 million for the University of Chicago Hospital.  It just so happens that Michelle Obama is the Vice President for Community Affairs at the hospital.  As Byron York notes, Michelle Obama made $121,910.00 in 2004 before her husband was elected to the United States Senate.  In 2005, after Obama won his election, she made $316,962.00.  According to the New York Times, the hospital denies that Michelle Obama ever lobbied her husband on behalf of her employer for the $1 million.  Barack Obama hopes for change in

Washington

.  It’s a sure bet that the University of Chicago will be keeping Mrs. Obama on the payroll hoping for some change too.  The question is, is this the type of change the voters really want?

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VE5DQO0&show_article=1&catnum=3

Obama Expands Delegate Lead 

Mar 15 07:05 PM

US

/Eastern

By MIKE GLOVER

Associated Press Writer

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama expanded his fragile lead in delegates over rival Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday, picking up at least seven delegates as Iowa activists took the next step in picking delegates to the national convention. Half the 14 delegates allocated to John Edwards on the basis of caucus night projections switched Saturday and Obama got most, if not all, of them.

Iowa Democratic Party officials said that with more than 86 percent of the delegates picked, Obama claimed 52 percent of the delegates elected at county conventions on Saturday, compared to 32 percent for

Clinton

. About 16 percent of the delegates picked at Saturday's conventions were sticking with Edwards, even though he's dropped from the race since

Iowa

held its caucuses in January. Democratic Party projections said the results mean Obama increased by seven the number of delegates he collects from the state, getting a total of 23 compared to 14 for

Clinton

and seven for Edwards, with one to be decided. Twelve automatic delegates bring the state's total to 57. Obama has been endorsed by four of those and

Clinton

three, with the remainder uncommitted.

Counting

Iowa

's results Saturday, an Associated Press delegate tally showed Obama with 1,610 delegates and Clinton with 1,496. Obama won the state's precinct caucuses in January with 39 percent of the vote, with Edwards narrowly edging

Clinton

to finish second. Projections on caucus night showed Obama getting 16 delegates, compared to 15 for

Clinton

and 14 for Edwards. "It means the Obama people are very organized," said Iowa Democratic Chairman Scott Brennan. "They have been working very hard for these conventions." Brennan said turnout was heavy, with more than 13,000 activists showing up at conventions in the state's 99 counties. "Today, Iowa Democrats again turned out in large numbers to reject the failed Bush-McCain campaign and its policies," said Brennan.

Edwards finished second in the state's leadoff precinct caucuses on Jan. 3, but those caucuses are only the first step in a complicated process of picking the state's 45 pledged delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Denver in August.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VE2OQG0&show_article=1&catnum=3

Obama Decries Racial Rhetoric 

Mar 15 04:04 PM

US

/Eastern

By TOM RAUM

Associated Press Writer

PLAINFIELD

,

Ind.

(AP) - Sen. Barack Obama on Saturday decried "the forces of division" over race that he said are intruding into the Democratic presidential nomination contest. "We have to come together," he told a town-hall meeting at a high school.

Obama cited inflammatory remarks made by his pastor that are now being used as political ammunition against him—remarks that Obama has denounced.

"If all I knew were those statements I saw on television, I would be shocked," Obama said. Obama suggested that more and more is being made of racial divisions as his contest with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton heats up.

"The forces of division have begun to raise their ugly head again," Obama said.

"It reminds me: We've got a tragic history when it comes to race in this country. A lot of pent-up anger and mistrust and bitterness. This country wants to move beyond these kinds of things." The

Illinois

senator's comments came a day after he denounced statements appearing on television and on the Internet by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, pastor of the

Chicago

church Obama joined nearly 20 years ago.

Obama said that pointing out racial differences only makes it harder to "deliver on the big issues we face in this country," which he said include health care, the slumping economy, terrorism and caring better for veterans. Obama, whose mother's family was from

Kansas

and his father from

Kenya

, said he was speaking "as someone who has little pieces of

America

in me." He said schools should do a better job of teaching all students African-American history "because that's part of American history," as well as women's struggle for equality, the history of unions, the role of Hispanics in U.S. and other matters that he suggested aren't given enough attention. "I want us to have a broad-based history" taught in schools, he said, even including more on "the Holocaust as well as other issues of oppression" around the world. Obama spoke in the gymnasium of

Plainfield

High School

, near

Indianapolis

, as he directed his political attention at states beyond the critical April 22

Pennsylvania

primary. "We are going to be campaigning actively in

Indiana

," Obama said to cheers.

Indiana

and

North Carolina

have primaries on May 6, two weeks after

Pennsylvania

.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080315183439.60xsb489&show_article=1&catnum=3

White House hopeful Obama condemns

Tibet

crackdown 

Mar 15 02:35 PM

US

/Eastern

US Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama condemned the Chinese crackdown on protestors in

Tibet

and called on

Beijing

to account for the status of Buddhist monks detained. "I am deeply disturbed by reports of a crackdown and arrests ordered by Chinese authorities in the wake of peaceful protests by Tibetan Buddhist monks," the

Illinois

senator said in a statement late Friday. "I condemn the use of violence to put down peaceful protests, and call on the Chinese government to respect the basic human rights of the people of

Tibet

, and to account for the whereabouts of detained Buddhist monks." Obama said the protests, which

Tibet

's government-in-exile in

India

said had resulted in 30 deaths, "demonstrate the continuing frustration of the Tibetan people at the way in which

Beijing

has ruled

Tibet

." He said this year's Olympics in

Beijing

are an opportunity for

China

to demonstrate its progress. "But the events in

Tibet

these last few days unfortunately show a different face of

China

," said Obama, who is vying for the Democratic party's presidential nomination against rival Senator Hillary Clinton.

"Now is the time for

Beijing

to take steps that would change the image people have of

China

later this year by changing the reality of how they treat

Tibet

and Tibetans. Now is the time to respect the human rights and religious freedom of the people of

Tibet

."

http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/america-obama-wright-1998925-rev-bless

Obama's pastor disaster

MARK STEYN

Syndicated columnist

Saturday, March 15, 2008

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright thinks that, given their treatment by white

America

, black Americans have no reason to sing "God Bless

America

." "The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless

America

.' No, no, no, God damn

America

," he told his congregation. "God damn

America

for treating our citizens as less than human."  I'm not a believer in guilt by association, or the campaign vaudeville of rival politicians insisting this or that candidate dissociate himself from remarks by some fellow he had a 30-second grip'n'greet with a decade ago. But Jeremiah Wright is not exactly peripheral to Barack Obama's life. He married the Obamas and baptized their children. Those of us who made the mistake of buying the senator's latest book, "The Audacity Of Hope," and assumed the title was an ingeniously parodic distillation of the great sonorous banality of an entire genre of blandly uplifting political writing discovered circa page 127 that in fact the phrase comes from one of the Rev. Wright's sermons. Jeremiah Wright has been Barack Obama's pastor for 20 years – in other words, pretty much the senator's entire adult life. Did Obama consider "God Damn America" as a title for his book but it didn't focus-group so well?

Ah, well, no, the senator told ABC News. The Rev. Wright is like "an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with." So did he agree with goofy old Uncle Jeremiah on Sept. 16, 2001? That Sunday morning, Uncle told his congregation that the

United States

brought the death and destruction of 9/11 on itself. "We nuked far more than the thousands in

New York

and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye," said the Rev. Wright. "We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9051.html

Story behind the story: Obama's pastor

By: Mike Allen

Mar 15, 2008 08:10 AM EST

Politicians know a troublesome story has “broken through” the Eastern media echo chamber when Jay Leno is laughing at them. In the case of the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., retiring pastor and outgoing spiritual adviser to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), it took less than 48 hours. The fracas started Thursday morning, when ABC’s “Good Morning America” ran a Brian Ross expose on Wright that included old video of him saying: “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God bless America’? No, no, no. Not God bless

America

. God [expletive]

America

.”  On Friday night, there was Leno on NBC’s “Tonight Show” joshing: “McCain was running so fast from President Bush, he ran into Barack Obama, who was running from his minister.” The story had burst onto the radar screen of average Americans with as much velocity as any other story during the 2008 campaign.

Political reporters and editors were inundated with e-mails from red-state friends and relatives wanting to know why the brouhaha wasn’t getting more instant and constant coverage from every news outlet. To reporters who had followed the campaign, it was an old, oft-written story. But this time it had video of Wright saying things like “U.S. of K.K.K.A.,” available on YouTube and played endlessly by cable news channels.

A key part of Obama’s case is electability — the notion that he can heal the nation’s red-blue divide by appealing to Republicans, or “Obamacans,” as he gleefully calls these crossover supporters. The coverage of Wright's comments bolstered the effort by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) to raise vague doubts about the judgment of her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination. And it revived conservative chatter about Obama’s patriotism that has been fueled by rumors he does not put his hand on his heart for the Pledge of Allegiance (false) and stopped wearing a flag lapel pin (true).

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25506

She's No Jackie O

by Michelle Oddis

Posted: 03/14/2008

Is Barack Obama’s wife as charismatic as he? Though the mainstream media would have us believe so, anyone who’s read her remarks over the past few months couldn’t help be convinced that Michelle Obama may be as much of a help to her husband as Bill Clinton has been to his wife. It’s all part of the “Obamalot” parody: if the Kennedy administration was “Camelot”, then -- the fawning media insist -- an Obama administration must be its second coming. And if Barack is to play the role of JFK, that leaves M.O. to play Jackie-before-O. But the media hasn’t made much headway in convincing us that she’s the second coming of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. In fact, I probably have as much in common with Jackie O as the lady whose initials I share. Just how would Michelle Obama’s modus operandi compare to Jackie O’s?

So here it is: M.O.’s m.o. by M.O. In the past few months too many articles have been published with titles such as, “Michelle O suited to be the next Jackie O” and “Michelle O meets Jackie O.” It makes a good title, great alliteration, but the last initial in their names is about the only thing that Jackie Onassis and Michelle Obama have in common. Not that Obama-promoter Katie Couric could see that. She is one of those who have swallowed this myth-making hook, line and sinker.  “At a time when her husband is benefiting from the Kennedy family’s collective thumbs-up -- with formal endorsements this week from Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and his son, Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy, as well as Caroline Kennedy -- Michelle’s modish but modern allusion to Jackie was more than auspicious,” said the Politico.  Many of these articles interview Shelly Branch, a Wall Street Journal editor and co-author of What Would Jackie Do? a national bestseller that describes itself as an “Inspired Guide to Distinctive Living.” The book has 10 chapters consisting of topics like how to throw a good party, how to dress elegantly, how to decorate your home, and how to “have your way with powerful men.” Hardly issues that Michelle Obama has pushed into public discourse through out her husband’s campaign.

Surface items may match up, political husbands, bouffant hairstyles, outfits -- but Jackie O always kept herself well away from political activism. Jackie said things like “I want minimum information given with maximum politeness,” and “I want to live my life, not record it.” She remained out of the lime light of political opinions. In contrast, it seems that Michelle Obama embraces political activism with glee, and can hardly keep her mouth shut.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9053.html

Obama,

Clinton

brace for 3-month deadlock

By JONATHAN MARTIN & MIKE ALLEN | 3/16/08 7:35 AM EST 

The Democratic race has entered its World War I phase, a bloody fight between two adversaries making only the most incremental of gains. And there is no reason to think either side will emerge from the trenches anytime soon.

There are 10 scheduled contests left, but thanks to proportional allocation, not enough pledged delegates to be had for either Barack Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton to clinch the nomination. And, because of increasingly firm demographic voting trends, it appears to be a foregone conclusion who will capture most of the states left.

So on June 3rd, when

South Dakota

and

Montana

end the current voting calendar, the contours of the race aren't likely to be much different than they are today.

That means two-and-a-half months of conference calls, attacks, counter-attacks and millions of dollars spent all to move the political needle just a few inches.

“It’s going to be a long, hard slog,” predicted Jim Jordan, a veteran Democratic strategist not working for either candidate. “It’s not good for the party.”

Pennsylvania

, which votes on April 22nd, and

Indiana

and

North Carolina

, which both go on May 6th, will be closely watched, as will

Florida

and

Michigan

in the event they vote again. But the stretch otherwise lacks any obvious primary of consequence or other decisive moment that could spell the end for either candidate.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/123582

The Deep Blue Divide

For months, Democrats were just thrilled with their choices. Now they can't even stand to sit together.

By Julia Baird | NEWSWEEK

Mar 24, 2008 Issue

For the past five years, a group of friends, mostly military wives or retired government workers, have been meeting for lunch at an Italian restaurant called Amici's in a strip mall in

Stafford

,

Va.

All Democrats, they don't come just for the wood-fired pizza or $8.99 lunch buffet. They come to talk about their beloved party. But lately, the air has chilled in the Tuscan-themed room.  At the lunch after

Clinton

's loss in

Virginia

, Alicia Knight, 49, a Hillary supporter, came in late. The only spare chair was between two Obama supporters, both old friends of Knight's. "I was so angry, I didn't want to sit between them, so I sat by myself at another table," she says. "It's become like the cold war: in order to maintain the relationship, you don't talk to each other." Recently, the Clinton and Obama groups began lunching separately. "We couldn't take the bashing, the smirkiness of the Obama fans," says Linda Berkoff, 63.  It's unclear exactly when the primaries stopped being a joyous occasion for the Democrats. But as the weeks have ground on, the intensity between Democrats who disagree has calcified, the vitriol grown fiercer. According to exit polling in the

Texas

primary, 91 percent of

Clinton

supporters said they would be dissatisfied with Obama as the nominee; 87 percent of Obama fans said they would be dissatisfied with

Clinton

. Nationally, a