100 Days left until Victory!
100 reasons NOT to re-elect Governor Jennifer Granholm…OK more!
100 reasons NOT to re-elect Senator Debbie Stabenow…yes, yes, the list grows daily!
But 100 days left to get all the work done that will ultimately help bring Michigan back, is daunting all in itself. We have lots of work to do and every hour you can volunteer at a Victory Center, or for a candidate and/or just talk to your friends and neighbors about this election is IMPORTANT.
We are at a point in this campaign where the Democrats are increasing their level of attacks. Both the Granholm campaign and the Stabenow campaign have bankrolled millions of dollars to go after our Republican candidates.
Polls are showing Michigan Republicans in a unique position nationwide. We are the only state where national pundits are putting us on a “watch” list where Republicans could knock off two Democrat incumbents.
We are in a single state recession, with leadership that can’t or just isn’t capable of leading the effort to turn things around. Granholm and Stabenow live in a “state of denial” and keep promising things will get better. Years of empty promises.
Two incumbents, both with records that don’t match their rhetoric.
***********************************************************
The campaign for the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate is in full swing. Both Sheriff Mike Bouchard and Reverend Keith Butler have gone up on TV with new ads. The candidates are criss-crossing the state in the final week of the primary looking for Republican votes to determine who our nominee will be.
Some have expressed concern about going “negative against one another” rather than focusing on why each is the better candidate to beat Debbie Stabenow. Let’s stay focused and keep our eye on the prize.
For more information go to their web sites at:
http://www.bouchardforussenate.com/
http://www.butlerforussenate.com/
***********************************************************
“Man bites dog!”
Now both the Detroit Free Press and Lansing State Journal all of the sudden are complaining that their own words are being used in an ad that some how confuses the voter about the distinction between their writers and the paper…give me a break.
The Granholm campaign has gone on the offensive with a negative campaign that includes straight out lies, distortions and innuendos that are intended to have people question Dick DeVos and his motives and positions. The DeVos campaign documents and points out that fact in a very straightforward ad.
One activist sent me his letter to the editor after the Free Press wrote their editorial. I couldn’t of say it any better…so why try. Here is the bulk of his text:
“What is especially comical is your editorial's suggestion that there is somehow a distinction to be found between the opinions of Free Press columnist Dickerson and the “institutional” opinions of the Free Press. In the editorial you, a majority of the editorial board, whoever, wrote:
“The original ad attributed to the Free Press the words "phony" and “magoguery," supposedly describing Granholm's rhetoric against DeVos. In fact, those words appeared in a column by Brian Dickerson of the Free Press, which makes them one person's view as opposed to the newspaper expressing an opinion on its editorial page. The revised ad attributes the words only to the generic "press" and to a "Free Press column."
WHILE THE DISTINCTION MAY BE LOST ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC, IT IS SIGNIFICANT TO A NEWSPAPER THAT MAY HOLD INSTITUTIONAL OPINIONS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE OF ITS COLUMNISTS…” (emphasis added)
What utter bunkum. “May hold institutional opinions quite different from those of its columnists”??? Please, name the local columnist at the Detroit Free Press who might even remotely be described as conservative (sports and hunting excluded). The Free Press stable of hyper-liberal local columnists could not be more in line with the paper’s hyper-liberal, anti-Republican Party editorial board if your brains were all hard wired together by USB cable.
Moreover, that distinction is not lost on the public at all. That may fly around the water cooler at the Free Press, but it only shows how isolated you have become. If Mr. Dickerson commited libel and the Knight Ridder or Gannett (or whichever conglomerate owns you at the moment) was sued and tried to separate itself from the columnist and defend itself by harrumphing “Why, judge, we are not responsible, we do not necessarily endorse that opinion, why 'a newspaper may hold institutional opinions quite different from those of its columnists'…” the judge would laugh that “institutional opinion” right out of the courtroom.
The fact is that the “institutional opinions” of the Free Press (or any newspaper) are merely the opinions of some other writers and cartoonists; a majority of the paper’s editorial board which in some cases may mean as few as three people. But draping the august mantle of “The Detroit Free Press” over the mere opinions of Ron, Mike and Nicole certainly vests those opinions with a lot more authority and weight than their opinions would otherwise have.
Or deserve.”
Now that’s a letter to the editor! OK folks, back to work. We have lots to do.
Together, let’s make every day count!!!
Saul Anuzis