Just How
Liberal Is Debbie Stabenow?
“This report proves what
Michiganders already know—that Debbie Stabenow is one of the most liberal
Senators in the nation, and does not represent the views of the people of her
home state,” said NRSC spokesman, Dan Ronayne. “Debbie Stabenow walks in
lock-step with John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and Hillary Clinton, not with
According to respected political
publication National Journal,
Debbie Stabenow’s liberal score for 2005 is 86.3, making her the ninth most
liberal member of the Senate, outranking nationally known liberals such as New
York Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer and on par with Massachusetts
Senator John Kerry.
|
Year |
Stabenow |
|
Schumer |
Kennedy |
Kerry |
|
2005 |
86.3 |
79.8 |
77.8 |
96.7 |
86.7 |
(National Journal Website, www.nationaljournal.com, Accessed
February 24, 2006)
And according to
|
Year |
Stabenow |
|
Kennedy |
Kerry |
|
2005 |
100 |
100 |
95 |
100 |
|
2004 |
100 |
95 |
100 |
25 |
|
2003 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
85 |
|
2002 |
95 |
95 |
100 |
85 |
|
2001 |
100 |
95 |
100 |
95 |
|
2000 |
90 |
-- |
90 |
90 |
|
1999 |
95 |
-- |
95 |
95 |
|
1998 |
100 |
-- |
95 |
95 |
|
1997 |
95 |
-- |
100 |
95 |
|
Average |
96.67 |
96 |
96.67 |
95 |
(Congressional Quarterly Website,
“Member Profiles: Debbie Stabenow, Hillary Clinton, Edward Kennedy, John Kerry,”
www.cq.com, Accessed February 24,
2006)
PERHAPS THAT
IS WHY STABENOW HAS RECEIVED SO
MUCH $UPPORT
FROM DC-BASED LIBERAL INTEREST GROUPS
“Stabenow’s
Greatest Financial Success Has Been Found Among Unions, Liberal Interests Groups
And Trial Lawyers.” (Jon Pepper, “Bush Clobbers Gore
In Raising Campaign Funds In
Stabenow “Is
Backed By A Number Of Liberal Interests.” “Ms. Stabenow, 55, is
backed by a number of liberal interests, including the pro-choice
Emily’s List, and as a member of the
House she received a 100 percent rating from NARAL for her pro-choice voting
record.” (Steve Miller, “Michigan Minister
Eyes Senate Bid,” The
For Stabenow’s
2006 Campaign, “Controversial Feminist Money Machine” EMILY’s List “Expects To
Pump Millions Of Dollars Into
Ø
Through December 2005, Stabenow
Had Received Over $250,000 In Special Interest Largesse From EMILY’s
List. According to EMILY’s List finance records
on file with the Federal Election Commission, EMILY’s List directed or bundled
$258,477 to Stabenow’s campaign through December 2005. (Federal Election Commission
Website, www.fec.gov, Accessed February 24,
2006)
In Stabenow’s
2000 Senate Campaign, EMILY’s List And Its Members Gave Her $1.4 Million,
“Nearly One-Fifth Of Her Total.” “In 2000, Emily’s List sent $1.4 million to
Stabenow – nearly one-fifth of her total – and more than $600,000 to Granholm
two years later. This time, the group’s members are expected to open their
purses even more generously, setting off an escalating spending war with
Republicans who believe both first-termers can be knocked off.”
(Deb Price, “Women Pour Cash Into
EMILY’s List
Promises To Do “Whatever It Takes” To Get Debbie Stabenow
Re-Elected.” “‘You are going to see every aspect of Emily’s
List in
Stabenow Is
The Beneficiary Of Several Other Liberal Interest
Groups:
Ø
Since 1996, Stabenow’s Campaign
Committees Have Received $21,407 From The National Abortion And Reproductive
Rights Action League (NARAL) Pro-Choice
Ø
Since 1996, Stabenow’s Campaign
Committees Have Received $33,690 From The Ultra-Liberal Human Rights Campaign
Ø In 2000, The Radical Anti-Bush Organization MoveOn Contributed $31,649 To Stabenow’s Senate Campaign. (Center For Responsive Politics Website, www.opensecrets.org, Accessed September 30, 2005)